0
BuildLocal

Advice

The Confidence Trap: Why Taking Charge Might Be Sabotaging Your Success

Related Reading:

Here's something nobody wants to admit: confidence can be your worst enemy.

I've spent seventeen years watching supposedly confident leaders crash and burn spectacularly. They stride into boardrooms, chest puffed out, ready to "take charge of their life" like some self-help guru promised them. Six months later? They're wondering why their team despises them and their projects are hemorrhaging money.

The problem isn't lack of confidence. It's the wrong kind of confidence.

The Marlborough Man Syndrome

You know the type. I call it the Marlborough Man Syndrome - that rugged, individualistic confidence that looks impressive in movies but creates workplace disasters in real life. These are the managers who mistake being loud for being heard. Who confuse stubbornness with determination.

Last month, I watched a Melbourne-based retail manager lose three of his best staff because he was so "confidently" micromanaging everything. His justification? "I'm taking charge, just like you taught us."

No mate. That's not taking charge. That's taking over.

Real confidence - the kind that actually works - is quieter. It's admitting when you don't know something. It's asking for help before you're drowning. It's trusting your team instead of controlling them.

The 73% Problem

Here's a statistic that'll make you uncomfortable: 73% of "confident" leaders I've worked with were actually covering up massive insecurities. They'd rather make a wrong decision confidently than admit uncertainty and make the right one collaboratively.

I was guilty of this myself. Back in 2018, I was consulting for a Brisbane logistics company and absolutely convinced them to implement a system I thought would revolutionise their operations. My confidence was infectious. The CEO bought it completely.

Eighteen months and $400,000 later, we scrapped the whole thing.

My mistake wasn't the system choice - though that was rubbish too. My mistake was being so bloody confident about something I hadn't properly researched that nobody questioned it. Including me.

What Real Confidence Looks Like

True confidence isn't about having all the answers. It's about being comfortable with questions.

The most successful leader I know - let's call her Sarah from a Perth mining company - starts most meetings with "Here's what I don't understand yet." She asks stupid questions. She admits mistakes before anyone else notices them. Her team would walk through fire for her.

Compare that to the "confident" types who spend meetings proving how smart they are. Their teams spend those same meetings planning their exit strategies.

Real confidence shows up in these ways:

Saying "I was wrong" before anyone else has to. This isn't weakness - it's strength. It takes genuine confidence to admit error publicly. Insecure people double down. Confident people course-correct.

Asking for help early, not late. Confident leaders know their limitations. They build teams specifically to cover their blind spots. The fake-confident ones hire people exactly like themselves and wonder why they keep making the same mistakes.

Making decisions with incomplete information. Here's the thing confident people understand: you'll never have perfect information. Ever. But you can make good decisions with 70% of the facts and adjust as you learn more. The "taking charge" crowd waits for 100% certainty and misses every opportunity.

The Authenticity Delusion

Let me tackle something that drives me mental: this obsession with "authentic leadership." Half the leadership coaches out there are telling people to "just be yourself" as if your current self is automatically leadership material.

Sometimes your authentic self is a bit of a disaster. Sometimes you need to grow into someone better.

I'm naturally quite impatient. That's my "authentic" self. But authentic impatience makes me a terrible leader. So I've learned to be authentically curious instead. Same energy, better direction.

The confidence to grow beyond your default settings - that's what separates good leaders from the authenticity merchants selling leadership snake oil.

The Control Paradox

Here's where it gets interesting. The more you try to control everything, the less in control you actually are.

I see this constantly with new managers. They get promoted and immediately start trying to control every detail of their team's work. They think this is "taking charge." Really, they're just creating a bottleneck with themselves at the centre.

Confident leaders do the opposite. They create systems that work without them. They delegate meaningfully, not just the boring stuff. They measure outcomes, not activities.

This is particularly relevant in Australia's changing workplace culture. The old command-and-control style that might have worked in the mining boom simply doesn't cut it with today's workforce. Modern employees - especially the talented ones - want autonomy, not micromanagement.

The Vulnerability Sweet Spot

Now, before you think I'm advocating for weak leadership, let me be clear: there's a sweet spot between arrogance and self-doubt.

You need enough confidence to make tough decisions. But not so much that you stop listening to feedback. You need enough vulnerability to connect with people. But not so much that they lose faith in your ability to lead.

The best leaders I know operate in this sweet spot. They're decisive when decisions are needed. They're open when input is valuable. They adjust their approach based on the situation, not their ego.

Getting It Wrong (And That's Okay)

I've made virtually every leadership mistake possible. I've been too soft, too harsh, too involved, too distant. Each failure taught me something valuable about what real confidence actually means.

The turning point came when I stopped trying to be the leader I thought I should be and started being the leader my team actually needed. That required letting go of my image of confident leadership and embracing something messier but more effective.

Some days that means admitting I have no idea what we should do next. Other days it means making unpopular decisions quickly. The confidence isn't in always knowing the right answer - it's in trusting that we'll figure it out together.

The Bottom Line

Taking charge of your life doesn't mean controlling everything around you. It means taking responsibility for your impact, your growth, and your decisions. It means being confident enough to be uncertain. Strong enough to be vulnerable. Smart enough to know what you don't know.

Most importantly, it means understanding that real confidence isn't about you at all. It's about what you enable in others.

The leaders who get this right don't just take charge - they create charge in everyone around them. That's the difference between leadership that looks good in theory and leadership that actually works.

And if you're sitting there thinking "but what about..." - good. Questions are the beginning of real confidence.